← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mykyta Volobuyev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-25 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Elite 34 6 14 20 0.588 0.0543 0.0530 0.1347 0.1314
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 43 2 5 7 0.163 0.0213 0.0207 0.0553 0.0538
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 41 5 4 9 0.220 0.0287 0.0287 0.0745 0.0745
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC JR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC SO 23 2 1 3 0.130
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Neumann
+425.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21615
Defenseman overall
#3173
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2022-23
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.