IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Elrod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 8 18 26 0.684 0.1001 0.1020 0.3355 0.3420
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 46 11 8 19 0.413 0.0604 0.0604 0.2025 0.2025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 24 1 0 1 0.042
2022-23 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2021-22 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 23 2 4 6 0.261
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30541
Forward overall
#1621
Forward born in 1999
#992
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

JoJo Bojanowski
Nichols · 2006-07
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Santino
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Archambeault
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.