IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Blackwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — EHL 26 12 9 21 0.808 0.1733 0.1722 0.3955 0.3929
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 44 16 40 56 1.273 0.2731 0.2731 0.6232 0.6232
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 18 6 2 8 0.444
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 9 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2021-22 · Fredonia
+273.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16486
Forward overall
#605
Forward born in 1999
#94
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jamie Hawkrigg
Amherst · 2007-08
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Paul
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Webb
Utica · 2001-02
1.577 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.