IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Lockhart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tilton NE-Prep 30 3 10 13 0.433 0.0836 0.0836 0.1983 0.1983
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 4 12 16 0.593 0.1143 0.1143 0.2712 0.2712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 0 11 11 0.407
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 17 1 3 4 0.235
2020-21 Plymouth State D1 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10749
Defenseman overall
#2014
Defenseman born in 2001
#616
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Girduckis
Chatham · 2016-17
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2001-02
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.