← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHLP 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 New York Apple Core EHL 24 2 4 6 0.250 0.0578 0.0626 0.1223 0.1326
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2020-21 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 22 7 13 20 0.909 0.2100 0.2100 0.4448 0.4448
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 14 0 1 1 0.071
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC 30 2 9 11 0.367
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 24 1 10 11 0.458
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 17 1 3 4 0.235
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC 31 4 5 9 0.290
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 18 3 6 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · Lake Forest
+984.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8012
Defenseman overall
#1660
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.