| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | New York Apple Core | EHLP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | New York Apple Core | EHL | 24 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.250 | 0.0578 | 0.0626 | 0.1223 | 0.1326 |
| 2019-20 | Brunswick | NE-Prep | 30 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.200 | 0.0396 | 0.0396 | 0.0911 | 0.0911 |
| 2020-21 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 22 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.909 | 0.2100 | 0.2100 | 0.4448 | 0.4448 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SR | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.071 |
| 2024-25 | Yale | D1 | ECAC | — | 30 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.367 |
| 2023-24 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | JR | 24 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2022-23 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SO | 17 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.235 |
| 2022-23 | Yale | D1 | ECAC | — | 31 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.290 |
| 2021-22 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | FR | 18 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.