IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Dusek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.0436 0.0476 0.1131 0.1235
2018-19 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.1219 0.1266 0.3163 0.3285
2019-20 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 38 21 29 50 1.316 0.1721 0.1721 0.4466 0.4466
2020-21 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 14 45 59 1.341 0.1754 0.1754 0.4551 0.4551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 24 2 4 6 0.250
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 25 0 4 4 0.160
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 21 1 3 4 0.191
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8840
Forward overall
#380
Forward born in 2000
#346
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Wilson
Lebanon Valley · 2005-06
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Yzaguirre
Utica · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Skar
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.