IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Rohrer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wisconsin Whalers NA3HL 20 2 8 10 0.500 0.1150 0.1253 0.1584 0.1725
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 43 13 21 34 0.791 0.2606 0.2716 0.2690 0.2803
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 13 1 9 10 0.769 0.2535 0.2535 0.2617 0.2617
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 39 15 31 46 1.179 0.3888 0.3888 0.4013 0.4013
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC JR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 3 2 5 0.208
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2753
Defenseman overall
#581
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Lovier
SUNY Cortland · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.