← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Cole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Huntsville Otters OJHL 34 4 5 9 0.265 0.0649 0.0676 0.1820 0.1896
2006-07 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 42 6 17 23 0.548 0.1342 0.1331 0.3766 0.3735
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
2024-25 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
2023-24 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
2022-23 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
2021-22 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
2020-21 Syracuse ACHA_D1 23 4 5 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2020-21 · Syracuse
+327.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40720
Forward overall
#1353
Forward born in 1988
#2637
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2002-03
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.