IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Leale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 45 9 18 27 0.600 0.1386 0.1493 0.2936 0.3162
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 20 1 4 5 0.250
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 31 1 10 11 0.355
2023-24 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 27 1 3 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+15.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26955
Forward overall
#1521
Forward born in 2003
#749
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Rohrer
Neumann · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sheldon Wing
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2002-03
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.