IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Enebak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lakeville North USHS-MN 21 1 19 20 0.952 0.1173 0.1173 0.2313 0.2313
2021-22 Lakeville North USHS-MN 28 7 22 29 1.036 0.1276 0.1276 0.2516 0.2516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 20 1 3 4 0.200
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 7 0 3 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2022-23 · Saint John's
+267.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3779
Defenseman overall
#974
Defenseman born in 2004
#808
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Haines
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Santiago
Utica · 2007-08
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.