IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Sargent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Northern Colorado Eagles USPHL-Premier 34 2 9 11 0.324 0.0365 0.0365 0.1098 0.1098
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 36 1 3 4 0.111 0.0257 0.0250 0.0895 0.0870
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 27 1 8 9 0.333
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 23 0 3 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Fitchburg State
+452.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20347
Defenseman overall
#3050
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buster Hebda
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Lindberg
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.