IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Lawhorne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 36 3 10 13 0.361 0.0407 0.0407 0.1228 0.1228
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 43 0 4 4 0.093 0.0105 0.0101 0.0316 0.0303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 14 1 0 1 0.071
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 16 1 2 3 0.188
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 21 0 2 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2022-23 · Franklin Pierce
+902.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22686
Defenseman overall
#3277
Defenseman born in 2001
#5997
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Schmelzinger
Elmira · 2015-16
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Paredes
Wentworth · 2021-22
0.059 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Shanley
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.067 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.