← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0071 0.0071 0.0169 0.0169
2019-20 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.0357 0.0357 0.0847 0.0847
2020-21 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 6 2 4 6 1.000 0.1929 0.1929 0.4576 0.4576
2021-22 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 24 1 7 8 0.333 0.0643 0.0643 0.1525 0.1525
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 10 1 0 1 0.100
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Bowdoin
+30.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23712
Defenseman overall
#3623
Defenseman born in 2002
#1520
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.