IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake McGonagle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pingree NE-Prep 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0199 0.0199 0.0473 0.0473
2021-22 Berwick NE-Prep 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0154 0.0154 0.0366 0.0366
2022-23 Berwick NE-Prep 28 0 12 12 0.429 0.0827 0.0827 0.1961 0.1961
2024-25 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27180
Defenseman overall
#4243
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Smith
Bethel · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Ginand
UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Medure
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.