IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Orozco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 43 2 12 14 0.326 0.0367 0.0367 0.1108 0.1108
2021-22 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 35 3 7 10 0.286 0.0322 0.0317 0.0972 0.0956
2022-23 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 42 6 22 28 0.667 0.0752 0.0702 0.2268 0.2118
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA GR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10195
Defenseman overall
#2175
Defenseman born in 2002
#3116
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mathieu Parent
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Cimino
Trinity · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Allen
Utica · 2017-18
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.