IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Douglas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0186 0.0185 0.0463 0.0462
2023-24 New Jersey 87's EHL 46 6 15 21 0.457 0.1055 0.1044 0.2234 0.2210
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 30 0 17 17 0.567
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 27 0 6 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · St. Michael's College
+236.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15354
Defenseman overall
#2865
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lefave
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albergo
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.