IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Israels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 55 27 21 48 0.873 0.2139 0.2096 0.6009 0.5889
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 51 29 57 86 1.686 0.4133 0.4133 1.1610 1.1610
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 34 10 15 25 0.735
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 33 20 6 26 0.788
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 34 9 6 15 0.441
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 29 4 8 12 0.414
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8998
Forward overall
#395
Forward born in 1999
#121
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frank Vitucci
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Eppright
University of New England · 2015-16
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.