← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Kloepfer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Aurora Tigers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Aurora Tigers OJHL 47 2 6 8 0.170 0.0417 0.0417 0.1172 0.1172
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Aurora Tigers OJHL 37 3 5 8 0.216 0.0530 0.0508 0.1489 0.1428
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 28 3 2 5 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2020-21 · Ohio University
+353.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24352
Defenseman overall
#3679
Defenseman born in 2002
#4521
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.