← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Longo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-29 Country: Canada
SUNY Plattsburgh
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Pickering Panthers OJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Aurora Tigers OJHL 49 2 10 12 0.245 0.0600 0.0619 0.1686 0.1738
2024-25 OJHL 49 3 21 24 0.490 0.1200 0.1175 0.3372 0.3303
2025-26 Toronto Patriots OJHL 45 3 17 20 0.444 0.1089 0.1007 0.3060 0.2831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13691
Defenseman overall
#2697
Defenseman born in 2005
#2771
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Plattsburgh Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
0.44
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
0.36
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh
0.22
actual FR PPG at SUNY Plattsburgh

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.