IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Les Haggett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 54 22 51 73 1.352 0.2932 0.2642 1.0460 0.9426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Brown D1 ECAC SR 31 11 15 26 0.839
2003-04 Brown D1 ECAC JR 28 5 24 29 1.036
2002-03 Brown D1 ECAC SO 35 13 20 33 0.943
2001-02 Brown D1 ECAC FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2001-02 · Brown
+112.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7907
Forward overall
#221
Forward born in 1980
#43
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.