← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryland Mosley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0620 0.0719 0.2210 0.2563
2016-17 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1085 0.1201 0.3869 0.4284
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0434 0.0458 0.1547 0.1633
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 55 17 26 43 0.782 0.1696 0.1715 0.6049 0.6116
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 56 23 58 81 1.446 0.3137 0.3137 1.1191 1.1191
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 37 18 19 37 1.000
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SR 40 18 15 33 0.825
2022-23 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 39 12 19 31 0.795
2021-22 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 36 5 8 13 0.361
2020-21 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2020-21 · Michigan Tech
+48.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10634
Forward overall
#440
Forward born in 2000
#88
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2006-07
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.