← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryland Mosley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0912 0.1058 0.2212 0.2565
2016-17 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1596 0.1767 0.3871 0.4286
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0639 0.0675 0.1548 0.1634
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 55 17 26 43 0.782 0.2496 0.2524 0.6052 0.6119
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 56 23 58 81 1.446 0.4618 0.4618 1.1197 1.1197
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 37 18 19 37 1.000
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SR 40 18 15 33 0.825
2022-23 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 39 12 19 31 0.795
2021-22 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 36 5 8 13 0.361
2020-21 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2020-21 · Michigan Tech
0.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10138
Forward overall
#411
Forward born in 2000
#107
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2006-07
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.