IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 11 11 22 0.373 0.1191 0.1215 0.2887 0.2945
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 28 32 60 0.968 0.3090 0.3090 0.7491 0.7491
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 32 11 17 28 0.875
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 28 8 8 16 0.571
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 30 13 17 30 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+861.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23649
Forward overall
#1081
Forward born in 2000
#593
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kaden Milles
Beloit · 2019-20
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johan Granath
New England College · 2004-05
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.