IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Robitaille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-07 Country: USA
SUNY Potsdam
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 23 0 7 7 0.304 0.0603 0.0603 0.1386 0.1386
2022-23 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 22 0 4 4 0.182 0.0360 0.0360 0.0828 0.0828
2024-25 — CCHL 18 2 2 4 0.222 0.0482 0.0469 0.1719 0.1673
2025-26 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 49 20 25 45 0.918 0.3744 0.3516 0.7382 0.6933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17084
Forward overall
#894
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Potsdam Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brandon Couto
0.59
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Gordon Bell
0.80
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Kevin MacLellan
0.65
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Robert Clerc
0.62
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam

D2/3 Comparables

Trent Krueger
Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McCann
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.