IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Dotson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-30 Country: USA
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Westminster NE-Prep 26 4 12 16 0.615 0.1219 0.1219 0.2804 0.2804
2023-24 Westminster NE-Prep 23 2 2 4 0.174 0.0344 0.0344 0.0792 0.0792
2024-25 Navan Grads CCHL 14 0 3 3 0.214 0.0465 0.0460 0.1658 0.1639
2025-26 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 49 9 51 60 1.224 0.4992 0.4766 0.9843 0.9398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
62%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1286
Defenseman overall
#195
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mike Egan
1.00
actual FR PPG at Babson
Matt Wiesner
0.88
actual FR PPG at Babson
Nathan Cook
1.12
actual FR PPG at Babson
Michael Stevens
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.