IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leo La Vecchia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-05 Country: Canada
SUNY Potsdam
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2169 0.2317 0.7660 0.8184
2025-26 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 49 12 10 22 0.449 0.0974 0.0986 0.3439 0.3483
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38522
Forward overall
#1592
Forward born in 2007
#981
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Potsdam Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jakub Hall
0.36
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Adam Martinez
0.48
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Andrew Blanchard
0.25
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam
Adam Place
0.41
actual FR PPG at SUNY Potsdam

D2/3 Comparables

Jamie Hawkrigg
Amherst · 2006-07
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Mezera
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
J.T. Entelisano
Utica · 2016-17
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.