IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Iisai Pesonen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-20 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 KalPa U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 KalPa U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 36 3 3 6 0.167 0.0904 0.0965 0.2521 0.2690
2022-23 KalPa U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 45 5 14 19 0.422 0.2288 0.2342 0.6385 0.6536
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC JR 28 6 7 13 0.464
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC SO 25 1 2 3 0.120
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC FR 30 5 1 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Yale
+30.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33080
Forward overall
#1997
Forward born in 2004
#999
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Fennell
Tufts · 2021-22
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eyan Gonzalves-Helm
Rivier · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.