IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Hemming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-08-13 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 18 2 8 10 0.556 0.3007 0.3443 0.8252 0.9447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 19 1 7 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2025-26 · Boston College
+42.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15602
Forward overall
#206
Forward born in 2008
#466
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

Anders Bjork
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Stevens
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2013-14
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2006-07
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.