IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Feamster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 41 6 11 17 0.415 0.0520 0.0517 0.1309 0.1301
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 40 5 23 28 0.700 0.0878 0.0830 0.2210 0.2090
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 23 2 4 6 0.261

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12549
Defenseman overall
#2492
Defenseman born in 2003
#2015
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Kreuser
Concordia · 2017-18
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Hawkins
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Mueller
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.