IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelton Chadwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 45 2 24 26 0.578 0.1329 0.1344 0.1830 0.1851
2024-25 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 41 3 27 30 0.732 0.1683 0.1615 0.2318 0.2224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 11 0 2 2 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10270
Defenseman overall
#2214
Defenseman born in 2004
#1611
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gianpaolo Giamartino
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Sokol
Hobart · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.