← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelton Chadwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 45 2 24 26 0.578 0.0725 0.0733 0.1824 0.1845
2024-25 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 41 3 27 30 0.732 0.0918 0.0881 0.2310 0.2216
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 NCHC 11 0 2 2 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10440
Defenseman overall
#2236
Defenseman born in 2004
#1610
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.