IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Skiöld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-23 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Södertälje SK U20 SHL-J20 6 2 0 2 0.333 0.1852 0.1922 0.4441 0.4610
2014-15 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 35 9 11 20 0.571 0.2255 0.2214 0.7760 0.7619
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 14 26 40 0.952 0.2673 0.2648 0.7831 0.7759
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 18 44 62 1.378 0.3867 0.3643 1.1328 1.0672
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13375
Forward overall
#532
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2013-14
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rasberg
University of New England · 2016-17
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.