IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Flatley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 25 7 10 17 0.680 0.0861 0.0861 0.1652 0.1652
2023-24 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 27 11 11 22 0.815 0.1032 0.1032 0.1979 0.1979
2024-25 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 28 10 10 20 0.714 0.0904 0.0904 0.1735 0.1735
2025-26 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 26 12 18 30 1.154 0.1448 0.1475 0.3643 0.3712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 16 1 8 9 0.562
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 16 1 8 9 0.562
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 16 1 8 9 0.562
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 16 1 8 9 0.562

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23763
Forward overall
#756
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Robertson
Suffolk · 2006-07
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Miller
Adrian · 2004-05
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.