IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Mulder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHLP 30 2 4 6 0.200 0.0229 0.0229 0.0451 0.0451
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHLP 40 0 4 4 0.100 0.0115 0.0118 0.0225 0.0232
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 — — 32 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30291
Defenseman overall
#4447
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Lefave
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Beaudry
Aurora · 2016-17
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Loerzel
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.