← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Glamkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 USPHL-Premier 44 31 27 58 1.318 0.1724 0.1884 0.4474 0.4890
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 43 22 17 39 0.907 0.1186 0.1238 0.3078 0.3212
2023-24 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 40 19 31 50 1.250 0.1635 0.1627 0.4242 0.4223
2024-25 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 42 20 28 48 1.143 0.1495 0.1401 0.3879 0.3634
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 30 16 15 31 1.033

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10879
Forward overall
#453
Forward born in 2004
#525
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.