IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Abrego Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 34 2 6 8 0.235 0.0308 0.0308 0.0799 0.0799
2022-23 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 34 4 8 12 0.353 0.0462 0.0439 0.1198 0.1139
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2020-21 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 26 0 4 4 0.154

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17049
Defenseman overall
#2989
Defenseman born in 2002
#4786
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Chadwell
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick O'Connor
Augsburg · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Russell
Norwich · 2005-06
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.