← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Chinian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 31 8 7 15 0.484 0.0447 0.0447 0.1108 0.1108
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 18 1 1 2 0.111 0.0145 0.0143 0.0377 0.0372
2022-23 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 43 26 24 50 1.163 0.1521 0.1427 0.3947 0.3703
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 8 1 2 3 0.375

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27564
Forward overall
#1587
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.