← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Alfieri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-25 Country: USA
Lake Forest
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 35 13 22 35 1.000 0.1312 0.1361 0.3395 0.3522
2024-25 West Chester Wolves NCDC 41 4 13 17 0.415 0.1690 0.1689 0.3318 0.3316
2025-26 West Chester Wolves NCDC 51 5 18 23 0.451 0.1839 0.1739 0.3609 0.3413
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18476
Forward overall
#977
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Lake Forest Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.75
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
0.47
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
0.30
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lake Forest

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.