IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Braatz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 36 4 19 23 0.639 0.1123 0.1059 0.1464 0.1381
2023-24 — USPHL-Premier 36 0 1 1 0.028 0.0092 0.0086 0.0095 0.0089
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25721
Defenseman overall
#3986
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kurt Gottschalk
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Woodward
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Busse
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.045 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.