← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jett Carroll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-09 Country: Canada
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 14 7 10 17 1.214 0.1588 0.1558 0.4121 0.4043
2025-26 Utah Outliers NCDC 50 3 9 12 0.240 0.0978 0.0927 0.1929 0.1828
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4522
Defenseman overall
#1161
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.38
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.30
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.46
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.