← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Miedema Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-22 Country: Canada
2023 · Round 4, Pick #109  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Windsor Spitfires OHL 65 14 24 38 0.585 0.3382 0.3672 1.5307 1.6620
2022-23 — OHL 68 20 32 52 0.765 0.4424 0.4612 2.0023 2.0873
2023-24 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 68 18 23 41 0.603 0.3488 0.3469 1.5786 1.5701
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 23 34 57 0.864 0.4996 0.4711 2.2613 2.1324
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 68 25 22 47 0.691 0.3999 0.3570 1.8098 1.6156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8448
Forward overall
#324
Forward born in 2005
#431
in OHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.