| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Windsor Spitfires | OHL | 65 | 14 | 24 | 38 | 0.585 | 0.3382 | 0.3672 | 1.5021 | 1.6309 |
| 2022-23 | — | OHL | 68 | 20 | 32 | 52 | 0.765 | 0.4424 | 0.4612 | 1.9649 | 2.0483 |
| 2023-24 | Kingston Frontenacs | OHL | 68 | 18 | 23 | 41 | 0.603 | 0.3488 | 0.3469 | 1.5492 | 1.5408 |
| 2024-25 | Kingston Frontenacs | OHL | 66 | 23 | 34 | 57 | 0.864 | 0.4996 | 0.4711 | 2.2190 | 2.0925 |
| 2025-26 | Guelph Storm | OHL | 68 | 25 | 22 | 47 | 0.691 | 0.3999 | 0.3570 | 1.7760 | 1.5854 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.