IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matteo Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-04 Country: USA
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Elite 44 6 24 30 0.682 0.0629 0.0606 0.1561 0.1503
2025-26 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 41 1 8 9 0.220 0.0287 0.0273 0.0745 0.0709
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18458
Defenseman overall
#3284
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

William Hawkins
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post
Justin Brown
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post
Jonathan Meijer
0.25
actual FR PPG at Post
Costa Pizanis
0.15
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Kovalchik
Castleton · 2012-13
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ike Frankel
Nichols · 2021-22
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Varney
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.