IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Logan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-01 Country: USA
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Providence Capitals EHL 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0144 0.0147 0.0306 0.0313
2025-26 — NOJHL 40 0 9 9 0.225 0.0383 0.0357 0.0954 0.0888
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28150
Defenseman overall
#4278
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sebastian Rominiecki
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Logan Dapprich
0.40
actual FR PPG at Rivier
Jake Murphy
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
T.J. Murphy
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Bodine
New England College · 2003-04
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Carter
Elmira · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Carangelo
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.