IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Hetherington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-03 Country: USA
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 46 7 7 14 0.304 0.0703 0.0735 0.1489 0.1556
2024-25 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 42 13 13 26 0.619 0.1430 0.1421 0.3029 0.3009
2025-26 — EHL 38 16 12 28 0.737 0.1702 0.1595 0.3605 0.3378
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26920
Forward overall
#1546
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matteo Peca
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post
Cayden Sweitzer
0.25
actual FR PPG at Post
Noah Wild
0.50
actual FR PPG at Post
Eoin Reager
0.33
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Russell
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Sutherland
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schultz
Elmira · 2018-19
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.