IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-18 Country: Canada
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Taft NE-Prep 22 12 23 35 1.591 0.3199 0.3199 0.7275 0.7275
2023-24 Taft NE-Prep 25 7 9 16 0.640 0.1287 0.1287 0.2927 0.2927
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 51 12 18 30 0.588 0.2398 0.2365 0.4707 0.4643
2025-26 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 52 23 32 55 1.058 0.4312 0.4021 0.8464 0.7893
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7563
Forward overall
#269
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicholas Bondra
0.71
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Keenan Hodgson
1.11
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Michael Rowbotham
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Conor Brown
0.86
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Pendo
Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Metheral
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.