← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Novak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-29 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Hamilton
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Roxbury Latin NE-Prep 17 1 3 4 0.235 0.0473 0.0473 0.1076 0.1076
2022-23 Roxbury Latin NE-Prep 22 2 0 2 0.091 0.0183 0.0183 0.0416 0.0416
2023-24 Roxbury Latin NE-Prep 23 6 3 9 0.391 0.0787 0.0787 0.1789 0.1789
2024-25 Salisbury School NE-Prep 30 9 17 26 0.867 0.1743 0.1743 0.3963 0.3963
2025-26 — NCDC 37 11 23 34 0.919 0.3746 0.3717 0.7353 0.7295
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11877
Forward overall
#438
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.89
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.44
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.73
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.88
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2013-14
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.