IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Browning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Hoosac NE-Prep 21 14 9 23 1.095 0.2170 0.2170 0.4990 0.4990
2025-26 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 47 10 14 24 0.511 0.2082 0.2084 0.4104 0.4108
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14936
Forward overall
#593
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Devin Cobbold
0.62
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Georgi Gorodetsky
0.71
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Jeff Oddleifson
0.62
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Shaun Jameson
1.04
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

John Krapian
Post · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Avakovs
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.