IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sammy Ohannesian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Dogs NCDC 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.1125 0.1125 0.2218 0.2218
2016-17 Boston Dogs NCDC 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.1125 0.1125 0.2218 0.2218
2024-25 — NCDC 34 2 8 10 0.294 0.1199 0.1199 0.2364 0.2364
2025-26 Boston Dogs NCDC 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.1125 0.1125 0.2218 0.2218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8830
Defenseman overall
#1174
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nikolas Sombrowski
0.38
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Nick Chiappetta
0.27
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Adam Tracey
0.33
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
Jake Hines
0.19
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Paquette
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Zuccaro
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Benjamin Mickel
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.