← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ihnat Pazii Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-04 Country: Ukraine
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 North Bay Battalion OHL 63 9 15 24 0.381 0.2204 0.2380 0.9790 1.0571
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 38 10 10 20 0.526 0.3045 0.3131 1.3523 1.3903
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 68 16 20 36 0.529 0.3063 0.2995 1.3603 1.3302
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17308
Forward overall
#716
Forward born in 2006
#735
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
SM-Liiga-Jr 2023-24
0.51
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
AJHL 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2004-05
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.