IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Genc Ula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-10-26 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Peterborough Petes OHL 56 5 5 10 0.179 0.1033 0.1160 0.4676 0.5250
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 68 6 10 16 0.235 0.1361 0.1460 0.6161 0.6608
2026-27 Sudbury Wolves OHL 6 2 0 2 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14004
Defenseman overall
#857
Defenseman born in 2008
#1380
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Malinski
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
P.J. Forgione
OHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Duncan Ramsay
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.04
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Caeden Herrington
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.24
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Rose
Elmira · 2000-01
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Howie
Marian · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.