IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Genc Ula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-10-26 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Peterborough Petes OHL 56 5 5 10 0.179 0.1033 0.1160 0.4589 0.5153
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 68 6 10 16 0.235 0.1361 0.1460 0.6046 0.6485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13813
Defenseman overall
#769
Defenseman born in 2008
#1356
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Duncan Ramsay
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.04
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Caeden Herrington
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.24
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Jack Malinski
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Mario Gasparini
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Suede
Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Nyman
Hamline · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.