← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julian Demiglio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-22 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 55 16 22 38 0.691 0.1693 0.1800 0.4757 0.5057
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1157 0.1154 0.5139 0.5125
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 67 14 16 30 0.448 0.2591 0.2453 1.1506 1.0895
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18881
Forward overall
#800
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2014-15
0.25
actual FR PPG at RIT
OJHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at RIT
OJHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at RIT
MJHL 2019-20
0.37
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.