← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sonny Arsenault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHLP 31 14 10 24 0.774 0.0888 0.0879 0.1745 0.1727
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 31 2 3 5 0.161 0.0373 0.0371 0.0789 0.0784
2025-26 Express Hockey Club EHL 48 11 25 36 0.750 0.1733 0.1625 0.3670 0.3441
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33341
Forward overall
#1998
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.47
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.50
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.33
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2021-22
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.